The optimum support selection by using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process method for Beheshtabad water transporting tunnel in Naien

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

Mining Engineering, Petroliom and Geophysics Faculty, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran

Abstract

The engineers can frequently encounter with the situation to select the optimum option among the alternatives related with tunneling operations. The optimum choice can be selected by the experienced engineers taking into consideration their judgment and intuition. However, decision-making methods can offer to the engineers to support their optimum selection for a particular application in a scientific way. The Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) is one of the multi attribute decision-making (MADM) methods utilizing structured pair-wise comparisons. This paper presents an application of the FAHP method to the selection of the optimum support design for water transporting tunnel in Naien. The methodology considers six main criteria, considering: displacement values for determined history locations, factor of safety (FOS), cost (total cost), time, mechanization and applicability factor for the selection of support design. The displacements and stress values were obtained by using the finite difference program FLAC2D as the numerical studies have been widely used by engineers examining the response of tunnels, in advance. After carrying out several numerical models for different support designs, the FAHP method was incorporated to evaluate these support designs according to the pre-determined criteria. These studies show that such FAHP application can effectively assist engineers to evaluate the alternatives support system for tunnels.

Keywords


bibitem{BaKo:Spcicfr}
G. Bojadzive and M. Bojadzive, {it Fuzzy set fuzzy logic applications}, World scientific Publishing,
{bf 26}textbf{(3)} (2000).

bibitem{BeFu:Fio}
D. Y. Chang, {it Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP}, European Journal Of Operational Research, {bf 95}textbf{(4)} (1996), 649--655.

bibitem{Bel:Fco}
D. Chatterjee and B. Mukherjee, {it Study of fuzzy-Ahp model to search the criterion in the valuation of the best technical institutions :a case study}, International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology,
{bf 2}textbf{(7)} (2010), 2499--2510.

bibitem{Bel:FcoII}
H. Deng, {it Multicriteria analysis whit fuzzy pair-wise comparison}, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,
{bf 6}textbf{(21)} (1999), 215--231.

bibitem{Bel:FRS}
I. Ertugral and A. Tus, {it Interactive fuzzy liner programming and an application sample at a textile firm}, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, (2007), 29--49.

bibitem{Ger:FL}
M. Hashemi, {it Rock mechanic’s reports}, Water Supply Project of the Central Plateau, Zayandehab Consulting, 2007.

bibitem{Gog:Lic}
A. Ishizakal and A. Labib, {it Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process}, Expert Systems with Applications, {bf 38}textbf{(11)} (2011), 14336--14345.

bibitem{Gog:Lfs}
Itasca Consulting Group, {it Flac version 4.10 User’s manual}, Minneapolis, 1999.


bibitem{Got:TMVL}
C. Kahraman, {it Capital budgeting techniques using discounted fuzzy cash flow}, In: D. Runa, J. Kacprzyk, M. Fedrizzi, eds., Soft Computing for Risk Evaluation and Management: Application in Technology, Environment and Finance. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, (2001), 375--396.

bibitem{Haj:MFL}
C. Kahraman, U. Cebeci and D. Runa, {it Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: the case of Turkey}, International Journal of Production Economics,
{bf 87} (2004), 171--184.

bibitem{Hoh:Crlm}
C. Kahraman, U. Cebeci and Z. Ulukan, {it Multi-criteria supplier selection using
  fuzzy AHP}, Logoistics Information Management, {bf 6}textbf{(16)} (2003), 382--394.


bibitem{Hoh:Offst}
C. Kahraman, D. Ruan and E. Tolga, {it Capital budgeting techniques using discounted fuzzy versus probabilistic cash flows}, Information Sciences, {bf 1-4}textbf{(42)} (2002), 57--76.

bibitem{MaGh:Fcs}
R. Mikaeil, M. Zare Naghdehi and M. Ataei, {it A decision support system using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) and topsis approaches for selection of the optimum underground mining method}, Arch. Mine. Sci, {bf 2}textbf{(54)} (2002), 341--368.


bibitem{RoEsGaGo:Icoar}
G. Once, M. Iphar and M. Yavuz, {it Study of ground control of the main transport road of the deep coal seam panels of GLI Tuncbilek mine in Turkey}, In: Proceedings of the second FLAC Symposium, (2001), 281--286.

bibitem{RoEsGaGo:Icoar1}
T. L. Saaty, {it The analytic hierarchy process}, New York: McGraw-Hil, 1980.

bibitem{RoEsGaGo:Icoar2}
S.H. Tsaur, T. Y. Chang and C. H. Yen, {it The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM}, Tourism Management, {bf 23} (2002), 107--115.

bibitem{RoEsGaGo:Icoar3}
S. H. Wang and Y. H. Chen, {it Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection}, Omega, the International Journal of Management Science, {bf 35} (2007), 384--388