COMBINING FUZZY QUANTIFIERS AND NEAT OPERATORS FOR SOFT COMPUTING

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

1 Systems and Industrial Engineering Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, Az 85721-0020, USA

2 Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 51664, Iran

Abstract

This paper will introduce a new method to obtain the order weights
of the Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) operator. We will first show the
relation between fuzzy quantifiers and neat OWA operators and then offer a
new combination of them. Fuzzy quantifiers are applied for soft computing
in modeling the optimism degree of the decision maker. In using neat operators,
the ordering of the inputs is not needed resulting in better computation
efficiency. The theoretical results will be illustrated in a water resources management
problem. This case study shows that more sensitive decisions are
obtained by using the new method.

Keywords


[1] D. Filev and R. R. Yager, On the issue of obtaining OWA operator weights, Fuzzy Sets and
Systems, 94 (1988), 157-169.
[2] R. Fullr and P. Majlender, An analytic approach for obtaining maximal entropy OWA operator
weights, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 124 (2001), 53-57.
[3] X. W. Liu, On the methods of decision making under uncertainty with probability information,
Int. J. Intell. Syst., 19 (2004), 1217-1238.
[4] X. W. Liu and H. Lou, Parameterized additive neat OWA operators with different orness
levels, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 21 (2006), 1045-1072.
[5] M. Marimin, M. Umano, I. Hatono and H. Tamura, Linguistic labels for expressing fuzzy
preference relations in fuzzy group decision making, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. B, 28
(1998), 205-218.
[6] M. O’Hagan, Aggregating template or rule antecedents in real-time expert systems with fuzzy
set, In: Grove P, editor. Proc 22nd Annual IEEE Asilomar Conf on Signals, Systems, Computers.
California, 1988, 681-689.
[7] J. I. Pel´aez and J. M. Do˜na, Majority additive-ordered weighting averaging: A new neat
ordered weighting averaging operators based on the majority process, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 18
(2003), 469-481.
[8] J. I. Pel´aez and J. M. Do˜na, A majority model in group decision making using QMA-OWA
operators, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 21 (2006), 193-208.
[9] C. E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell System Tech., 27 (1948),
379-423 and 623-656.
[10] J. Wu, C. Y. Liang and Y. Q. Huang, An argument-dependent approach to determining OWA
operator weights based on the rule of maximum entropy, Int. J. of Intell. Syst., 22 (2007),
209-221.
[11] Z. Xu, An overview of methods for determining OWA weights, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 20 (2005),
843-865.
[12] R. R. Yager, On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking,
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern., 18 (1988), 183-190.

[13] R. R. Yager, Families of OWA operators, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 59 (1993), 125-143.
[14] R. R. Yager and D. P. Filev, Parameterized and-like and or-like OWA operators, Int. J. Gen.
Sys., 22 (1994), 297-316.
[15] R. R. Yager, Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 11
(1996), 49-73.
[16] R. R. Yager, On the cardinality and attituditional charactersitics of fuzzy measures, Int. J.
Gen. Sys., 31 (2002), 303-329.
[17] R. R. Yager, Centered OWA operators, Soft Comp., 11 (2007), 631-639.
[18] L. A. Zadeh, A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages, Comput.
and Math. with App., 9 (1983), 149-184.
[19] M. Zarghami, F. Szidarovszky and R. Ardakanian, Sensitivity analysis of the OWA operator,
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. B, 38(2) (2008), 547-552.
[20] M. Zarghami and F. Szidarovszky, Revising the OWA operator for multi criteria decision
making problems under uncertainty, Euro. J. Oper. Res., 2008, (Article in press: doi:
10.1016/j.ejor.2008.09.014).