A NEW APPROACH IN FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS BASED ON COMPROMISE SOLUTION BY CONSIDERING OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE WEIGHTS WITH INTERVAL-VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) is a well-known risk analysis approach that has been conducted to distinguish, analyze and mitigate serious failure modes. It demonstrates the effectiveness and the ability of understanding and documenting in a clear manner; however, the FMEA has weak points and it has been criticized by some authors. For example, it does not consider relative importance among three risk factors (i.e., $ O, S $ and $ D $). Different sequences of $ O $, $ S $ and $ D $ may result in exactly the same value of risk priority number (RPN), but their semantic risk implications may be totally different and these three risk factors are difficult to be precisely expressed. This study introduces a new interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy (IVIF)-decision approach based on compromise solution concept that defeats the above weak points and improves the traditional FMEA's results. This study firstly employs both subjective and objective weights in the decision process simultaneously. Secondly, there are two kinds of subjective weights performed in the study: aggregated weights obtained by experts' assessments as well as entropy measure. Thirdly, this approach is defined under an IVIF-environment to ensure that the evaluation information would be preserved, and the uncertainties could be handled during the computations. Hence, it considers uncertainty in experts' judgments as well as reduces the probability of obtaining two ranking orders with the same value. Finally, the alternatives are ranked with a new collective index according to the compromise solution concept. To show the effectiveness of the proposed approach, two practical examples are solved from the recent literature in engineering applications. The proposed decision approach has an acceptable performance. Also, its advantages have been mentioned in comparison with other decision approaches.

Keywords


[1] K. Atanassov and G. Gargov, Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Sys-
tems, 31 (1989), 343{349.
[2] K. T. Atanassov, Operators over interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and
Systems, 64 (1994), 159{174.

[3] G. Baek, S. Kim, S. Cheon, H. Suh and D. Lee, Prioritizing for failure modes of dynamic
positioning system using fuzzy-FMEA, Journal of Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems, 25
(2015), 174{179.
[4] F. E. Boran, S. Genc M. Kurt and D. Akay, A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision
making for supplier selection with topsis method, Expert Systems with Applications, 36
(2009), 11363{11368.
[5] M. Braglia, Mafma: multi-attribute failure mode analysis, International Journal of Quality
& Reliability Management, 17 (2000), 1017{1033.
[6] N. Chanamool and T. Naenna, Fuzzy FMEA application to improve decision-making process
in an emergency department, Applied Soft Computing, 43 (2016), 441{453.
[7] C. L. Chang, C. C. Wei and Y. H. Lee, Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy method
and grey theory, Kybernetes, 28 (1999), 1072{1080.
[8] K. H. Chang and C. H. Cheng, A risk assessment methodology using intuitionistic fuzzy set
in FMEA, International Journal of Systems Science, 41 (2010), 1457{1471.
[9] K. H. Chang, C. H., Cheng and Y. C. Chang, Reprioritization of failures in a silane supply
system using an intuitionistic fuzzy set ranking technique, Soft Computing, 14 (2010), 285{
298.
[10] T. Y. Chen, A prioritized aggregation operator-based approach to multiple criteria decision
making using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets: a comparative perspective, Information
Sciences, 281 (2014), 97{112.
[11] T. Y. Chen, The inclusion-based topsis method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets
for multiple criteria group decision making, Applied Soft Computing, 26 (2015), 57{73.
[12] K. S. Chin, Y. M. Wang, G. K. K. Poon and J. B. Yang, Failure mode and effects analysis
by data envelopment analysis, Decision Support Systems, 48 (2009), 246{256.
[13] Y. Du, H. Mo, X. Deng, R. Sadiq and Y. Deng, A new method in failure mode and e ects
analysis based on evidential reasoning, International Journal of System Assurance Engineer-
ing and Management, 5 (2014), 1{10.
[14] H.R. Feili, N. Akar, H. Lotfi zadeh, M. Bairampour and S. Nasiri, Risk analysis of geothermal
power plants using failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) technique, Energy Conversion
and Management, 72 (2013), 69{76.
[15] H. Hashemi, J. Bazargan, S. M. Mousavi and B. Vahdani, An extended compromise ratio
model with an application to reservoir ood control operation under an interval-valued intu-
itionistic fuzzy environment, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38 (2014), 3495{3511.
[16] M. S. Kirkire, S. B. Rane and J. R. Jadhav, Risk management in medical product development
process using traditional FMEA and fuzzy linguistic approach: a case study, Journal of
Industrial Engineering International, 11 (2015), 595{611.
[17] M. Kumru and P. Y. Kumru, Fuzzy FMEA application to improve purchasing process in a
public hospital, Applied Soft Computing, 13 (2013), 721{733.
[18] R. J. Kuo, Y. H. Wu and T. S. Hsu, Integration of fuzzy set theory and TOPSIS into HFMEA
to improve outpatient service for elderly patients in taiwan, Journal of the Chinese Medical
Association, 75 (2012), 341{348.
[19] Z. Li and K. C. Kapur, Some perspectives to defi ne and model reliability using fuzzy sets,
Quality Engineering, 25 (2013), 136{150.
[20] H. C. Liu, L. Liu, Q. H. Bian, Q. L. Lin, N. Dong and P. C. Xu, Failure mode and effects
analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning approach and grey theory, Expert Systems with
Applications, 38 (2011), 4403{4415.
[21] H. C. Liu, L. Liu and P. Li, Failure mode and effects analysis using intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid
weighted euclidean distance operator, International Journal of Systems Science, 45 (2014),
2012{2030.
[22] H. C. Liu, J. X. You, M. M. Shan and L. N. Shao, Failure mode and effects analysis using
intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid TOPSIS approach, Soft Computing, 19 (2015), 1085{1098.
[23] P. Liu, L. He and X. Yu, Generalized hybrid aggregation operators based on the 2-dimension
uncertain linguistic information for multiple attribute group decision making, Group Decision
and Negotiation, 25 (2016), 103{126.

[24] P. Liu and F. Jin, A multi-attribute group decision-making method based on weighted geomet-
ric aggregation operators of interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, Applied Mathematical
Modelling, 36 (2012), 2498{2509.
[25] P. Liu and Y. Liu, An approach to multiple attribute group decision making based on intu-
itionistic trapezoidal fuzzy power generalized aggregation operator, International Journal of
Computational Intelligence Systems, 7 (2014), 291{304.
[26] P. Liu and Y. Wang, Multiple attribute decision-making method based on single-valued neu-
trosophic normalized weighted bonferroni mean, Neural Computing and Applications, 25
(2014), 2001{2010.
[27] P. Liu and X. Yu, 2-dimension uncertain linguistic power generalized weighted aggregation
operator and its application in multiple attribute group decision making, Knowledge-Based
Systems, 57 (2014), 69{80.
[28] P. Liu, X. Zhang and F. Jin, A multi-attribute group decision-making method based on
interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers hybrid harmonic averaging operators, Journal of
Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 23 (2012), 159{168.
[29] N. Rachieru, N. Belu and D. C. Anghel, Evaluating the risk of failure on injection pump
using fuzzy FMEA method, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 657 (2014), 976{980.
[30] S.-M. Seyed-Hosseini N. Safaei and M. Asgharpour, Reprioritization of failures in a system
failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique,
Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91 (2006), 872{881.
[31] F. Smarandache, Neutrosophy: neutrosophic probability, set, and logic: analytic synthesis
& synthetic analysis, American Research Press, USA, ISBN(s): 1879585634, 28(1) (1998),
25{38.
[32] B. Vahdani, M. Salimi and M. Charkhchian, A new FMEA method by integrating fuzzy belief
structure and TOPSIS to improve risk evaluation process, International Journal of Advanced
Manufacturing Technology, 77 (2015), 357{368.
[33] Z. Wang, K. W. Li and W. Wang, An approach to multiattribute decision making with
interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy assessments and incomplete weights, Information Sciences,
179 (2009), 3026{3040.
[34] D.Woods, A failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) from operating room setup to incision
for living donor liver transplantation, In 2015 Apha Annual Meeting & Expo, 5(2) (2015),
6{19.
[35] N. Xiao, H. Z. Huang, Y. Li, L. He and T. Jin, Multiple failure modes analysis and weighted
risk priority number evaluation in FMEA, Engineering Failure Analysis, 18 (2011), 1162{
1170.
[36] Z. Xu, An overview of methods for determining OWA weights, International Journal of In-
telligent Systems, 20 (2005), 843-865.
[37] Z. Xu, Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their
application to decision making, Control and Decision, 22 (2007), 215{225.
[38] R. R. Yager, On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision-
making, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18 (1988), 183{190.
[39] J. Ye, Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making method based on a novel accuracy function un-
der interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment, Expert Systems with Applications, 36
(2009), 6899{6902.
[40] J. Ye, Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making method using entropy weights-based correlation
coefficients of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34
(2010), 3864{3870.
[41] T. M. Yeh and L. Y. Chen, Fuzzy-based risk priority number in fmea for semiconductor wafer
processes, International Journal of Production Research, 52 (2014), 539{549.
[42] D. Yu, Y. Wu and T. Lu, Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy prioritized operators and their
application in group decision making Knowledge-Based Systems, 30 (2012), 57{66.
[43] S. X. Zeng, C. M. Tam and V. W. Tam, Integrating safety, environmental and quality risks
for project management using a fmea method, Engineering Economics, 66 (2015), 44{52.

[44] X. Zhang and Z. Xu, Soft computing based on maximizing consensus and fuzzy topsis ap-
proach to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making, Applied Soft Computing,
26 (2015), 42-56.
[45] Q. Zhou and V. V. Thai, Fuzzy and grey theories in failure mode and effect analysis for
tanker equipment failure prediction, Safety Science, 83 (2016), 74{79.