INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS FOR MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Universidad Autonoma de Ciudad Juarez, Av. del Charro, CP-32310, Ciudad Juarez, Chih., Mexico

2 Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM,88003-8001, USA

Abstract

Dimensional analysis, for multi-criteria decision making, is a mathematical method that includes diverse heterogeneous criteria into a single dimensionless index. Dimensional Analysis, in its current definition, presents the drawback to manipulate fuzzy information commonly presented in a multi-criteria decision making problem. To overcome such limitation, we propose two dimensional analysis based techniques under intuitionistic fuzzy environments. By the arithmetic operations of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, we describe the intuitionistic fuzzy dimensional analysis (IFDA) and the aggregated intuitionistic fuzzy dimensional (AIFDA) techniques. In the first technique, we consider only the handling of fuzzy information; and, in the second one we consider both quantitative (crisp) and qualitative (fuzzy) information typically presented together in a decision making problem. To illustrate our approaches, we present some numerical examples and perform some comparisons with other well-known techniques.

Keywords


[1] Y. Akao, Development History of Quality Function Deployment, Minato, Tokyo 107 Japan,
1994.
[2] K. AlFalahi, Y. Atif and A. Abraham, Models of Influence in Online Social Networks, International
Journal of Intelligent Systems,29(2) (2014), 1-23.
[3] J.J. An, D. F. Li and J. X. Nan, A mean-area ranking based non-linear programming approach
to solve intuitionistic fuzzy bi-matrix games, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. 33(1)
(2017), 563-573.
[4] B. Ashtiani, F. Haghighirad, A. Makui and G. A. Montazer, Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS
method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets, Applied Soft Computing. 9(2) (2009), 457-461.
[5] K. T. Atanassov, On Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Theory, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012.
[6] K. T. Atanassov,Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 20(1) (1986), 87-96.
[7] C. H. Bahl and G. R. Hunt, Decision-making theory and DSS design, Newsletter ACM
SIGMIS: the Database for Advances in Information Systems, 15(4) (1984) 10-14.
[8] I. Beg and T. Rashid, TOPSIS for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets, International Journal
of Intelligent System, 28(12) (2013), 1-10.
[9] F. E. Boran, S. Genc, M. Kurt and D. Akay, A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group deci-
sion making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method, Expert Systems with Applications,
36(8) (2009), 11363-11368.
[10] W. K. M. Brauers and E. K. Zavadskas, The MOORA method and its application to pri-
vatization in a transition economy by A new method: the MOORA method, Control and
Cybernetics, 35(2) (2006), 445-469.
[11] P. W. Bridgman, Dimensional Analysis, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1931.
[12] E. Buckingham, On Physically Similar Systems: Illustrations of the Use of Dimensional
Equations, Physical Review, 4(4) (1914), 345-376.
[13] M. Braglia and R. Gabbrielli, Technical note Dimensional analysis for investment selection
in industrial robots, International Journal of Production Research, 38(18) (2000), 4843-4848.
[14] A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making
units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6) (1978), 429-444.
[15] Z. Chen, K. Chin, Y. Li and Y. Yang, Proportional hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set for
multiple criteria group decision making, Information Sciences, 357 (2016), 61-87.
[16] N. Chen and Z. Xu, Hesitant fuzzy ELECTRE II approach: A new way to handle multi-
criteria decision making problems, Information Sciences, 292 (2015), 175-197.
[17] S. M. Chen and J. M. Tan, Handling Multicriteria Fuzzy Decision-making Problems Based
on Vague Set Theory, Fuzzy Sets System, 67(2) (1994), 163172.
[18] M. Collan, M. Fedrizzi and P. Luukka, New Closeness Coefficients for Fuzzy Similarity
Based Fuzzy TOPSIS: An Approach Combining Fuzzy Entropy and Multidistance, Advances
in Fuzzy Systems, 2015(2015), 1{12.
[19] L. de Boer, E. Labro and P. Morlacchi, A review of methods supporting supplier selection,
European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 7(2) (2001), 75-89.
[20] J. Dong, D. Y. Yang and S. P. Wan, Trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy prioritized aggrega-
tion operators and application to multi-attribute decision making, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy
Systems, 12(4) (2015), 1-32.
[21] M. Dursun and E. E. Karsak, A fuzzy MCDM approach for personnel selection, Expert
Systems with Applications, 37(6) (2010), 4324-4330.
[22] D. Dubois, The role of fuzzy sets in decision sciences: Old techniques and new directions,
Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 184(1) (2011), 3-28.
[23] B. Efe, An integrated fuzzy multi criteria group decision making approach for ERP system
selection, Applied Soft Computing Journal, 38 (2016), 106-117.
[24] J. Garca-Alcaraz, I. A. Alvarado and A. Maldonado-Macias, Seleccion de proveedores basada
en analisis dimensional, Contadura y Administracion, 58(3) (2013), 249-278.

[25] R. Ginevicius, A New Determining Method for the Criteria Weights in Multicriteria Evalu-
ation, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 10(6) (2011),
1067-1095.
[26] M. Goyal, D. Yadav and A. Tripathi, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Genetic Weighted Averaging Op-
erator and its Application for Multiple Attribute Decision Making in E-Learning, Indian
Journal of Science and Technology, 9(1) (2016), 1-15.
[27] K. Govindan, S. Rajendran, J. Sarkis and P. Murugesan, Multi criteria decision making
approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review, Journal of Cleaner
Production, 98 (2013), 66-83.
[28] K. Guo and W. Li, An attitudinal-based method for constructing intuitionistic fuzzy infor-
mation in hybrid MADM under uncertainty, Information Sciences, 208 (2012), 28-38.
[29] S. S. Hashemi, S. H. R. Hajiagha, E. K. Zavadskas and H. A. Mahdiraji, Multicriteria group
decision making with ELECTRE III method based on interval-valued eintuitionistic fuzzy
information, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40 (2015), 1554-1564.
[30] J. Holland, Adaptation in natural and arti ficial systems, University of Michigan Press, Cambridge,
MA, 1975.
[31] D. H. Hong and C. H. Choi, Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set
theory, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1) (2000), 103-113.
[32] C. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications,
Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981.
[33] S. Khaleie and M. Fasanghari, An intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making method using
entropy and association coefficient, Soft Computing, 16(7) (2012), 1197-1211.
[34] D. Li, Notes on "Possibilistic programming approach for fuzzy multidimensional analysis of
preference in group decision making", Computers and Industrial Engineering, 73 (2014), 1-4.
[35] D. F. Li, Closeness coefficient based nonlinear programming method for interval-valued intu-
itionistic fuzzy multiattribute decision making with incomplete preference information, Applied
Soft Computing, 11(4) (2011), 3402-3418.
[36] D. F. Li, Decision and Game Theory in Management with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Springer
Heidelberg, Germany 2014.
[37] H. Liao, Z. Xu, X. J. Zeng and D. L. Xu, An enhanced consensus reaching process in group de-
cision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations, Information Sciences, 329 (2016),
274-286.
[38] P. Liu and Y. Wang, Multiple attribute group decision making methods based on intuitionistic
linguistic power generalized aggregation operators, Applied Soft Computing, 17 (2014), 90-
104.
[39] F. R. Lima Junior, L. Osiro and L. C. R. Carpinetti, A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and
Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection, Applied Soft Computing, 21 (2014), 194-209
[40] L. Z. Lin and H. R. Yeh, A perceptual measure of mobile advertising using fuzzy linguistic
preference relation, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 10(5) (2013), 25-46.
[41] I. Mahdavi, N. Mahdavi-Amiri, A. Heidarzade and R. Nourifar, Designing a model of
fuzzy TOPSIS in multiple criteria decision making, Applied Mathematics and Computation,
206(2) (2008), 607-617.
[42] A. Mardani, A. Jusoh and E. K. Zavadskas, Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making tech-
niques and applications Two decades review from 1994 to 2014, Expert Systems with Applications,
42(8) (2015), 4126-4148.
[43] A. Mardani, A. Jusoh, K. MD Nor, Z. Khalifah, N. Zakwan and A. Valipour, Multiple criteria
decision-making techniques and their applications a review of the literature from 2000 to
2014, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraivanja, 28(1) (2015), 516-571.
[44] K. Maniya and M. G. Bhatt, A selection of material using a novel type decision-making
method: Preference selection index method, Materials and Design, 31(4) (2010), 1785-1789.
[45] F. Meng, and X. Chen, The symmetrical interval intuitionistic uncertain linguistic operators
and their application to decision making, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 98 (2016),
531-542.

[46] V. Mohagheghi, S. M. Mousavi and B. Vahdani, A new multi-objective optimization approach
for sustainable project portfolio selection: a real- world application under interval-valued
fuzzy environment, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 13(6) (2016), 41-68.
[47] J. Nan, T.Wang and J. An, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Distance- Based Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS
Method and Application to MADM, International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications, 5(4)
(2016), 43-56.
[48] S. Opricovic and G. H. Tzeng, Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative
analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2) (2004),
445-455.
[49] Z. Pei, Intuitionistic fuzzy variables: Concepts and applications in decision making, Expert
Systems with Applications, 42(22) (2015), 9033-9045.
[50] B. Roy, Classement et choix en presence de points de vue multiples(la method ELECTRE),
Revue Francaise de Recherche Operationnelle, 2(1) (1968), 57-75.
[51] B. D. Rouyendegh (Babek Erdebilli) and T. E. Saputro, Supplier Selection Using Integrated
Fuzzy TOPSIS and MCGP: A Case Study, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116
(2014), 3957-3970.
[52] T.L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New Haven, 1980.
[53] T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback,
RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 1996.
[54] G. D. Saari and K. K. Sieberg, Are partwise comparisons reliable?, Research in Engineering
Design, 15(1) (2004), 62-71.
[55] C. Spearman, The proof and measurement of association between two things, The American
Journal of Psychology, 15(1) (1904), 72-101.
[56] F. Tatari and M. Mazouchi, A self-organized multi agent decision making system based on
fuzzy probabilities: the case of aphasia diagnosis, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 11(6)
(2014), 21-46.
[57] A. Vega, J. Aguarn, J. Garca-Alcaraz and J. M. Moreno-Jimenez, Notes on Dependent
Attributes in TOPSIS, Procedia Computer Science, 31 (2014), 308-317.
[58] P. R. Villanueva and A. L. J. Garca, Evaluacion de Tecnologa utilizando TOPSIS en Pres-
encia de Multi-colinealidad en Atributos: Por qu usar distancia de Mahalanobis? Evaluation
of Technology using TOPSIS in Presence of Multi-collinearity in Attributes: Why use the
Mahalanobis distance, Revista de La Facultad de Ing. Univ. Antioquia, (67) (2013), 31-42.
[59] H. Wang and Z. Xu, Interactive algorithms for improving incomplete linguistic preference
relations based on consistency measures, Applied Soft Computing, 42 (2016), 66-79.
[60] F. Wang, S. and Zeng and C. Zhang, A method based on Intuitionistic fuzzy dependent ag-
gregation operators for supplier selection, Mathematical Problems Engineering, 2013 (2013),
1-9.
[61] T. C.Wang and Y. H. Chen, Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement
of consistency of fuzzy AHP, Information Sciences, 178 (2008), 3755-3765.
[62] S. P. Wan and Y. J. Zhu, Triangular intuitionistic fuzzy triple bonferroni harmonic mean
operators and application to multi-attribute group decision making, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy
Systems, 13(5) (2016). 117-145.
[63] T. Willis, C. Huston and F. Pohlkamp, Evaluation measures of justin- time supplier perfor-
mance, Production and Inventory Management Journal, 34(2) (1993), 1-6.
[64] D. A. Wood, Supplier selection for development of petroleum industry facilities , applying
multi-criteria decision making techniques including fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS
with flexible entropy weighting, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 28 (2016),
594-612.
[65] Z. Xu, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multiattribute Decision Making: An Interactive Method, IEEE
Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20(3) (2012), 514-525.
[66] Z. Xu, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems,
15(6) (2007), 1179-1187.
[67] Z. Xu, S. Member and H. Liao, Intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, Fuzzy Systems,
IEEE Transactions on. 22(4) (2014), 749-761.

[68] Z. Xu and R. R. Yager, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Bonferroni Means, International Journal of
Intelligent Systems, 27(2) (2011), 23-47.
[69] Z. Xu and R. R. Yager, Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy
sets, International Journal of General Systems, 35(4) (2006), 417-433.
[70] Z. Yue, Group decision making with multi-attribute interval data, Information Fusion, 14(4)
(2013), 551-561.
[71] E. K. Zavadskas, J. Antucheviciene and Z. Turskis, Hybrid multiple-criteria decision-making
methods: A review of applications in engineering, Scientia Iranica, 23 (2016), 1-20.
[72] L. Zadeh, Fuzzy Sets, Information and Control, 8(3) (1965), 338-353.
[73] M. Zeydan, A combined methodology for supplier selection and performance evaluation, Expert
Systems with Applications, 38(3) (2011), 2741-2743.
[74] W. Zhou and J. He, Intuitionistic fuzzy normalized weighted Bonferroni mean and its ap-
plication in multicriteria decision making, Journal of Applied Mathematics, (2012) (2012),
1-22.