Sustainability performance assessment with intuitionistic fuzzy composite metrics and its application to the motor industry

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Av. Universidad s/n, 03202, Elche, Spain

2 Universitat Polit\`ecnica de Val\`encia, Ferr\'andiz y Carbonell, 03801, Alcoy, Spain


The performance assessment of companies in terms of sustainability requires to find a balance between multiple and possibly conflicting criteria. We here rely on composite metrics to rank a set of companies within an industry considering environmental, social and corporate governance criteria. To this end, we connect intuitionistic fuzzy sets and composite programming to propose novel composite metrics. These metrics allow to integrate important environmental, social and governance principles with the gradual membership functions of fuzzy set theory. The main result of this paper is a sustainability assessment method to rank companies within a given industry. In addition to consider multiple objectives, this method integrates two important social principles such as maximum utility and fairness. A real-world example is provided to describe the application of our sustainability assessment method within the motor industry. A further contribution of this paper is a multicriteria generalization of the concept of magnitude of a fuzzy number.


[1] M. Akram, G. Ali, X. Peng, M. Z. Ul Abidin, Hybrid group decision-making technique under spherical fuzzy n-soft expert sets, Artificial Intelligence Review, (2021), 1-47.
[2] F. J. André, C. Romero, Computing compromise solutions: On the connections between compromise programming and composite programming, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 195(1) (2008), 1-10.
[3] I. M. Ar, I. Erol, I. Peker, A. I. Ozdemir, T. D. Medeni, I. T. Medeni, Evaluating the feasibility of blockchain in logistics operations: A decision framework, Expert Systems with Applications, 158 (2020), 113543.
[4] K. D. Atalay, G. F. Can, A new hybrid intuitionistic approach for new product selection, Soft Computing, 22(8) (2018), 2633-2640.
[5] K. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20 (1986), 87-96.
[6] K. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets: Theory and applications, Volume 283, Springer, 1999.
[7] E. Ballestero, Compromise programming: A utility-based linear-quadratic composite metric from the trade-off between achievement and balanced (non-corner) solutions, European Journal of Operational Research, 182(3) (2007), 1369- 1382.
[8] E. Ballestero, C. Romero, Multiple criteria decision making and its applications to economic problems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
[9] J. Berk, P. DeMarzo, Corporate finance, Global Edition, 5th ed. Pearson Australia, 2016.
[10] A. Bilbao-Terol, B. Pérez-Gladish, M. Arenas-Parra, M. V. Rodríguez-Uría, Fuzzy compromise programming for portfolio selection, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 173(1) (2006), 251-264.
[11] R. Biswas, On fuzzy sets and intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, 3(1) (1997), 3-11.
[12] R. A. Brealey, S. C. Myers, F. Allen, Principles of corporate finance, McGraw-Hill Education, 2019.
[13] G. Büyüközkan, F. Göçer, Y. Karabulut, A new group decision making approach with IF AHP and IF VIKOR for selecting hazardous waste carriers, Measurement, 134 (2019), 66-82.
[14] C. Carlsson, R. Fuller, On possibilistic mean value and variance of fuzzy numbers, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 122(2) (2001), 315-326.
[15] K. H. Chang, A novel supplier selection method that integrates the intuitionistic fuzzy weighted averaging method and a soft set with imprecise data, Annals of Operations Research, 272(1-2) (2019), 139-157.
[16] B. C. Cuong, V. Kreinovich, Picture fuzzy sets-a new concept for computational intelligence problems, In 2013 Third World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies, IEEE, (2013), 1-6.
[17] M. Delgado, M. A. Vila, W. Voxman, On a canonical representation of fuzzy numbers, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 93(1) (1998), 125-135.
[18] J. Dong, S. Wan, A new method for solving fuzzy multi-objective linear programming problems, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 16(3) (2019), 145-159.
[19] J. González-Pachón, C. Romero, Bentham, Marx and Rawls ethical principles: In search for a compromise, Omega, 62 (2016), 47-51.
[20] P. Grzegorzewski, Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and/or interval-valued fuzzy sets based on the Hausdorff metric, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 148(2) (2004), 319-328.
[21] Q. Gu, Z. Xuan, A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers based on possibility theory, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 309 (2017), 674-682.
[22] C. Kahraman, F. K. Gündogdu, Decision making with spherical fuzzy sets, Volume 392, Springer, 2021.
[23] M. Kannegiesser, H. O. Günther, O. Gylfason, Sustainable development of global supply chains-part 2: Investigation of the European automotive industry, Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 26(1) (2014), 48-68.
[24] N. A. Khan, O. A. Razzaq, A. Chakraborty, S. P. Mondal, S. Alam, Measures of linear and nonlinear interval-valued hexagonal fuzzy number, International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications, 9(4) (2020), 21-60.
[25] A. Kumar, R. Anbanandam, Environmentally responsible freight transport service providers’ assessment under data-driven information uncertainty, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(1) (2020), 506-542.
[26] E. S. Lee, R. J. Li, Fuzzy multiple objective programming and compromise programming with Pareto optimum, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 53(3) (1993), 275-288.
[27] D. F. Li, A ratio ranking method of triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and its application to MADM problems, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 60(6) (2010), 1557-1570.
[28] H. Liao, X. Mi, X. Xu, J. Xu, F. Herrera, Intuitionistic fuzzy analytic network process, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26(5) (2018), 2578-2590.
[29] S. Opricovic, Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10) (2011), 12983-12990.
[30] S. Opricovic, G. H. Tzeng, Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2) (2004), 445-455.
[31] R. J. Orsato, P. Wells, U-turn: The rise and demise of the automobile industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11-12) (2007), 994-1006.
[32] D. Pla-Santamaria, M. Bravo, J. Reig-Mullor, F. Salas-Molina, A multicriteria approach to manage credit risk under strict uncertainty, Top, 29(2) (2021), 494-523.
[33] P. Prodanovic, S. P. Simonovic, Fuzzy compromise programming for group decision making, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 33(3) (2003), 358-365.
[34] A. Raj Mishra, G. Sisodia, K. Raj Pardasani, K. Sharma, Multi-criteria it personnel selection on intuitionistic fuzzy information measures and ARAS methodology, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 17(4) (2020), 55-68.
[35] P. Rajarajeswari, A. S. Sudha, R. Karthika, A new operation on hexagonal fuzzy number, International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems, 3(3) (2013), 15-26.
[36] O. A. Razzaq, M. Fahad, N. A. Khan, Different variants of pandemic and prevention strategies: A prioritizing framework in fuzzy enviroment, Results in Physics, 28 (2021), 104564.
[37] J. Reig-Mullor, D. Pla-Santamaria, A. Garcia-Bernabeu, F. Salas-Molina, Novel distance measure in fuzzy TOPSIS to improve ranking process: An application to the Spanish grocery industry, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 53(1) (2019), 125-140.
[38] C. Romero, A note on distributive equity and social efficiency, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 52(2) (2001), 110-112.
[39] T. L. Saaty, The analytic hierarchy process, Mc Graw-Hill, 1980.
[40] F. Smarandache, A unifying field in logics, neutrosophy: Neutrosophic probability, set and logic, American Research Press, 1999.
[41] V. Torra, Hesitant fuzzy sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25(6) (2010), 529-539.
[42] I. B. Turksen, Interval valued fuzzy sets based on normal forms, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(2) (1986), 191-210.
[43] N. Vafaei, R. A. Ribeiro, L. M. Camarinha-Matos, Normalization techniques for multi-criteria decision making: Analytical hierarchy process case study, In Doctoral Conference on Computing, Electrical and Industrial Systems, Springer, (2016), 261-269.
[44] A. Venturelli, F. Caputo, R. Leopizzi, G. Mastroleo, C. Mio, How can CSR identity be evaluated? A pilot study using a fuzzy expert system, Journal of Cleaner Production, 141 (2017), 1000-1010.
[45] S. P. Wan, D. F. Li, Z. F. Rui, Possibility mean, variance and covariance of triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 24(4) (2013), 847-858.
[46] S. P. Wan, F. Wang, G. L. Xu, J. Y. Dong, J. Tang, An intuitionistic fuzzy programming method for group decision making with interval-valued fuzzy preference relations, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 16(3) (2017), 269-295.
[47] Z. Xu, H. Liao, Intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 22(4) (2013), 749-761.
[48] R. R. Yager, A. M. Abbasov, Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 28(5) (2013), 436-452.
[49] P. L. Yu, A class of solutions for group decision problems, Management Science, 19(8) (1973), 936-946.
[50] L. A. Zadeh, Information and control, Fuzzy Sets, 8(3) (1965), 338-353.
[51] L. A. Zadeh, The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, Information Sciences, 8(3) (1975), 199-249.
[52] E. K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, A new logarithmic normalization method in games theory, Informatica, 19(2) (2008), 303-314.
[53] M. Zeleny, Compromise programming, In Multiple Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, (1973), 262-301.