Document Type : Research Paper
Author
Department of Philosophy & Institute of Critical Thinking and Writing, Chonbuk National University, Rm 417, Colleges of Humanities & Social Science Blvd., Jeonju, 561-756, KOREA
Abstract
Micanorm-based logics with a weak form of associativity are introduced and their completeness results are addressed. More concretely, first the basic wa$_{t}$-uninorm logic \textbf{WA$_{\textbf{t}}$BUL} and its axiomatic extensions are introduced as $[0, t]$-continuous wa$_{t}$-uninorm analogues of the logics based the $[0, 1)$-continuous uninorms. Next algebraic structures characterizing the logics are introduced along with algebraic completeness results. Third, wa$_{t}$-uninorms are introduced as uninorms with weak $t$-associativity instead of associativity and associated properties are discussed. Finally, by virtue of Yang--style construction, it is verified that the logics based on wa$_{t}$-uninorms are complete on unit real interval $[0, 1]$, i.e., so called \emph{standard} complete.
Keywords
Main Subjects
Italian Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 28 (2011), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejc.2012.03.
032
linear first-order patial differential operators, Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii Ovidius Constanta, 22 (2014),
85-103. https://doi.org/10.2478/auom-2014-0008
and completeness properties, Review of Symbolic Logic, 6 (2013), 394-423. https://doi.org/10.1017/
S1755020300000000
F. Montagna, (ed), Springer, Dordrecht (2015), 245-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06233-4_12
Logic, Vol. 1, P. Cintula, R. Horˇc´ık, C. Noguera (eds.), College Publications, London, (2011), 103-207.
extensions of the monoidal t-norm logic, Studia Logica, 71 (2002), 393-420. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:
1016548805869
Systems, 124 (2001), 271-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(01)00098-7
49 (1973), 59-78. https://projecteuclid.org/journals/pacific-journal-of-mathematics/volume-49/
issue-1/A-nonassociative-extension-of-the-class-of-distributive-lattices/pjm/1102945268.full
(2007), 425-449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-007-0047-1
Transaction A, 28 (2004), 267-275.
Colloquium Mathematicum, 18 (1992), 41-44. https://doi.org/10.4064/cm-63-1-41-44
978-94-011-5300-3
(2002), 183-192. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015122331293
of Logic, 36 (2007), 145-157. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=
4bc2455a421b9fbc2ff63aaa49113ba907f90c45
10.1006/jabr.1996.0321
https://doi.org/10.1002/malq.200710074
org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/14279_RM_25_5.pdf
//www.jstor.org/stable/27588573
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9409-5
of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 39 (2020), 2775-2782. 10.3233/JIFS-191054
//doi.org/10.1016/j.ipl.2009.01.014
Naturalium Mathematica, 40 (2001), 215-224.
25156/25156-pdf.pdf
297-323. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005204532371
Series in Mathematical Physics), Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1017/
CBO9780511524479
//doi.org/10.22103/JMMRC.2012.345
1 (2014), 11-20. https://as.yazd.ac.ir/article_410_a84741ff38a501826228c29a144726fd.pdf
90-96.
org/10.1016/j.fss.2012.04.017
//doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2012.09.009
43-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2014.11.020
301 (2016), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2015.09.007
320 (2017), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2017.03.013
Systems, 33 (2017), 3743-3752. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-17623
//logicalkorea.com/attach/paper/20-2-ESYang.pdf?ckattempt=1
37 (2019), 7895-7907. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-190150
//logicalkorea.com/attach/paper/25-2_01_YangES.pdf
//doi.org/10.22111/IJFS.2022.6785