Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
Behbahan Khatam Alanbia university of technology
Abstract
Both traditional and fuzzy regression analyses have demonstrated the significant characteristics of the least-squares methodology as a method for parameter estimation.} The presence of outliers in the sample and/or minor variations in the dataset might impact the behaviour and characteristics of the least-squares estimators (LSE). In contrast, robust approaches provide estimators of the parameters that are resilient to the aforementioned unfavourable effects. This study aims to expand upon the Theil-Sen estimator in fuzzy regression analysis, with the objective of obtaining consistent findings even when outliers are present. \rd{ We demonstrate the effectiveness of the suggested technique through simulation experiments and real-world examples, comparing it to commonly used fuzzy regression models. The applicative examples are based on hydrology and atmospheric environment datasets. We also show the sensitivity analysis of the estimated parameters using a Monte-Carlo simulation study, demonstrating the effectiveness of the suggested estimators in comparison to other established approaches in the field of fuzzy regression analysis. The results showed that the Theil-Sen estimator (TSE) is very effective in cases where there are outliers, and the calculation error is smaller compared to other methods.
Keywords
Main Subjects
of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 351 (2019), 290-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2018.11.006
of reference evapotranspiration under controlled environment, International Journal of Hydrology Science and
Technology, 9(1) (2019), 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHST.2019.096791
311-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04424-2
Man, and Cybernetics, 12 (1982), 903-907. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1982.4308925
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.09.047
Systems, 27(4) (2017), 739-748. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2868554
Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 46(3) (2017), 1703-1714. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2015.1010002
187 (2022), 115891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115891
in predicting imperfections of cotton yarn, Journal of Textiles and Polymers, 4(2) (2016), 60-68.
119(2) (2001) 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00091-3
separation, Information Sciences, 655 (2024), 119893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119893
119(2) (2001), 259-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00049-4
Demonstration for meteorological applications, Comptes rendus de I’Acad´emie bulgare des Sciences, 70(12) (2017),
1701-1708.
ETCCDI climate indices, Comptes Rendus de L’Acad´emie Bulgare des Sciences, 72 (2019), 47-54.
https://doi.org/10.7546/CRABS.2019.01.06
84 (2019), 105708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105708
The University of Mississippi, 2008.
analysis, Metron, 71 (2013), 279-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40300-013-0025-9
4174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.04.031
118992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.118992
978-0-471-89997-6, 2001.
for predicting biophysical parameters in the presence of measurement errors, Remote Sensing of Environment, 95(3)
(2005), 303-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.01.005
statistics for intelligent data analysis, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33042-
1 13
Computational and Applied Mathematics, 388 (2021), 113270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2020.113270
Systems, 157(23) (2006), 3109-3122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2006.08.004
regression analysis, Applied Soft Computing, 117 (2022), 108423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108423
example, Social Science and Medicine, 309 (2022), 115241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115241
Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 16(05) (2008), 663-681.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488508005558
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2014.12.004
118-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2022.06.012
sciences, Recent Trends in Social Systems: Quantitative Theories and Quantitative Models, (2017), 235-247.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40585-8 21
fuzzy model, Information Sciences, 652 (2024), 119740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.119740
Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 16(04) (2008), 579-598.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S021848850800542X
analysis, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 15(04) (2007), 441-456.
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488507004789
https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(94)90144-9
New evidence from fuzzy regression discontinuity design, Energy Policy, 168 (2022), 113128.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113128
Academy of Sciences, 53 (1950), 368-392 (Part I), 521-525 (Part II), 1397-1412 (Part III).
Kybernetika, 43(4) (2007), 503-508.
215-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00350-9
Revstat-Statistical Journal, 21(1) (2023), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.57805/revstat.v21i1.398
Informatics, 14(3) (2023), 67-81. https://doi.org/10.17323/2587-814X.2020.3.67.81
the case of Shanghai, Soft Computing, 22 (2018), 5407-5418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3090-4