Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
Faculty of Engineering Science, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, P.O.Box 11365-4563, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
This paper presents some novel theoretical results as well as practical algorithms and computational procedures on continuous fuzzy relational equations programming problems. The fuzzy relational programming problem is a minimization (maximization) problem with a linear objective function subject to fuzzy relational equalities or inequalities defined with certain algebraic operations. In the literature, the commonly seen frameworks for such optimization models are to assume that the operation takes minimum t-norm, strict continuous t-norms (e.g., product t-norm), nilpotent continuous t-norms (e.g., Lukasiewicz t-norm) or Archimedean continuous t-norms. Based on new concepts called partial solution sets, the current paper considers this problem\textbf{ }in the most general case where the fuzzy relational equality constraints are defined by an arbitrary continuous t-norm and capture some special characteristics of its feasible domain and the optimal solutions. It is shown that the current generalized results are automatically reduced to (apparently) different ones that hold for special operators when continuous t-norm is replaced by strict, nilpotent or Archimedean continuous t-norm. Also, the relationship between the results derived here and those of previous publications regarding this subject is also discussed. Finally, the proposed algorithm is outlined and illustrated by a numerical example where the continuous fuzzy relational equations is defined by Mayor-Torrens operator that is not an Archimedean t-norm (and then, neither strict nor nilpotent).
Keywords
- Fuzzy relational equations
- Strict t-norms
- Nilpotent t-norms
- Archimedean t-norms
- Continuous t-norms
- Global optimization
- Linear optimization
Main Subjects
Sets and Systems, 94 (1998), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00246-1
Sciences, 234 (2013), 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.04.042
Soft Computing, 11(1) (2007), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-006-0050-1
IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2017.8015691
89-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(82)90043-4
problem, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 188 (2012), 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2011.07.014
engineering, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1650-5
Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 188 (2012), 68-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2011.09.008
978-1-4615-4429-6
(1999), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00184-X
234 (2013), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.06.009
defined by Dubois-Prade family of t-norms, Information Sciences, 503 (2019), 291-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.ins.2019.06.058
with fuzzy relational equations and max- Lukasiewicz composition, Applied Soft Computing, 69 (2018), 475-492.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.04.029
Systems, 206 (2012), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2012.04.009
defined by Dubois-Prade family of t-norms, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 119 (2018), 167-180.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.03.038
generalized fuzzy relational inequalities with fuzzy constraints (FRI-FC), Information Sciences, 418-419 (2017),
317-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.07.032
constraints, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20 (2023), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.22111/IJFS.2023.7552
Optimization and Decision Making, 12 (2002), 1568-4539. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020955112523
Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 161 (2010), 285-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2009.03.007
https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(84)90026-5
Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 143 (2004), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2003.06.007
norm, Soft Computing, 18 (2014), 1399-1404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-013-1152-1
(2011), 2951-2963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2011.03.004
composition, Information Sciences, 360 (2016), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.04.041
and Systems, 118 (2001), 509-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00417-5
and Systems, 119 (2001), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00471-0
Sets and Systems, 153 (2005), 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2005.02.010
253-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(82)80004-3
10 (1983), 185-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80114-6
and Applications, 107 (1985), 520-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(85)90329-4
77-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(91)90047-T
https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315216737
Systems, 147 (2004), 363-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2003.12.007
//doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(81)90059-2
relation equations, Information Sciences, 178 (2008), 3482-3490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2008.04.004
in: M. M. Gupta. G. N. Saridis, B. R. Games (Eds.), Fuzzy Automata and Decision Processes, North-Holland, New
York, (1977), 221-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1650-5
Sciences, 181 (2011), 832-841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2010.10.024
norms, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 120 (2001), 395-407.
complete Brouwerian lattices, Information Sciences, 224 (2013), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.
10.038
4216-4229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2007.02.037
Sets and Systems, 150 (2005), 147-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2004.09.010
linear objective function, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 10(4) (2002), 552-558. https://doi.org/10.1109/
TFUZZ.2002.800657
Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 3 (2004), 271-278. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FODM.0000036862.
45420.ea
relational equations with max-Archimedean t-norm composition, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 159 (2008), 3347-3359.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2008.04.007
addition-min composition, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 255 (2014), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2014.
04.007
Systems, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2019.08.005
with application in wireless communication, Information Sciences, 358-359 (2016), 44-55. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.ins.2016.04.014