Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Faculty of Mathematical Sciences, Shahrood University of Technology, P.O. Box 3619995161-316, Tel-Fax No:+98-23-32300235, Shahrood, Iran.
2 Shahrood University of Technology
Abstract
In this paper, an intelligent approach based on Radial Basis Function Neural Networks (RBFNNs) is used for
synchronization problem between two chaotic systems.
In this scheme, parallel systems have been first
applied by converting the
synchronization problem between two chaotic systems to synchronization problem
between their parallel systems.
By employing an active control strategy, an Infinite Horizon Optimal Control Problem (IHOCP) is constructed related to the
obtained paralleled dynamical models.
Using a suitable transformation, the IHOCP is then transformed into an equivalent finite-horizon one.
According to Pontryagin Maximum Principle (PMP),
the necessary optimality conditions for the finite horizon problem
are examined in the form of two-point boundary value problems (TPBVPs).
A fuzzy neural network approach
that utilizes Radial Basis Functions (RBFs) as its activation functions for one of the hidden layers is established to
approximate the solution of the TPBVP.
By relying on the ability of RBFNN as function approximator,
the trial solutions of variables are substituted in the TPBVP. The
obtained
algebraic nonlinear equations system is then reduced into an error function minimization problem.
A learning
scheme via center points of RBFs
as training dataset and based on
the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm is employed as the optimizer
to derive the adjustable parameters of trial solutions.
Some various chaotic systems are synchronized based on
numerical simulations to guarantee the capability of the
proposed plan.
Keywords
- Chaos synchronization
- parallel synchronization
- optimal control
- fuzzy system
- RBFNN
- Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm
Main Subjects
for solving multi-dimensional Volterra integral equations, International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and
Numerical Simulation, 18(5) (2017), 411-425. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnsns-2016-0160
control and backstepping scheme, Waves in Random and Complex Media, (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/
17455030.2023.2205529
Summary, 9(3a) (1956), 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8685-7-13
networks for fuzzy-rule extraction in high dimensional data, Pattern Recognition, 35 (2002), 659-675. https:
//doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(01)00033-4
equations, Numerical Algorithms, 73(1) (2016), 91-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11075-015-0087-2
reports, 366(1-2) (2002), 1-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(02)00137-0
Systems II: Analog and Digital Signal Processing, 40(10) (1993), 646-650. https://doi.org/10.1109/82.24616
Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 57 (2010), 2171-2179. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2009.2034681
Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 17(1) (2009), 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2008.2005010
applications in chaotic masking, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 28(10) (2018), 1850121. https:
//doi.org/10.1142/S0218127418501213
Fractals, 14(4) (2002), 643-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0779(02)00006-1
based on a generalized fuzzy hyperbolic model, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 302 (2016), 52-64. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.fss.2015.11.015
memristor-based chaotic system using active control, Modern Physics Letters B, 32(14) (2018), 1850142. https:
//doi.org/10.1142/S0217984918501427
in epileptiform activity local versus distant phase synchronization in generalized seizures, Journal of Neuroscience,
25(35) (2005), 8077-8084. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1046-05.2005
integer-order and fractional-order P-C method, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 164 (2022), 112646. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112646
und ihre Anwendungen, 19(1) (2000), 269-278. https://doi.org/10.4171/ZAA/950
Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing, 25 (2007), 231-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02832349
solving an environmental boundary value problem, Results in Applied Mathematics, 16 (2022), 100344. https:
//doi.org/10.1016/j.rinam.2022.100344
approach, Nonlinear Dynamics, 62(1-2) (2010), 453-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-010-9733-3
65(3) (2002), 036232. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.65.036232
in the modeling of cognitive decision making using a new fractional neural network, Mathematical Methods in the
Applied Sciences, 43 (2020), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.5981
finite difference θ-method, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 55 (2018), 265-276.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2017.07.017
treatments, Trends in Neurosciencesm, 30(7) (2007), 357-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2007.05.004
22(5) (1977), 728-740. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1977.1101601
using Talbot cavity, Optics Express, 21(21) (2013), 24952-24961. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.024952
A, 301(5-6) (2002), 424-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(02)00987-8
Networks, 2(5) (1989), 359-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8
(2004), 271-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2003.11.027
radial basis function neural networks, Neural Networks, 16(5-6) (2003), 729-734. https://doi.org/10.1016/
S0893-6080(03)00083-2
method, Physica Scripta, 94 (2016), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ab2679
delay fractional optimal control problems with Atangana–Baleanu derivative, Optimal Control Applications and
Methods, 41(3) (2020), 808-832. https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.2572
of fractional order with equality and inequality constraints, Soft Computing, 24 (2020), 9575-9594. https://doi.
org/10.1007/s00500-019-04465-7
for synchronization of chaotic fractional-order delayed neural networks via LMI approach, Chaos, Solitons and
Fractals, 169 (2023), 113252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113252
https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527634569
differential equations, A Survey, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 62 (2011), 3796-3811. https:
//doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.09.028
(2009), 1950-1958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2007.06.079
for solving ordinary differential equations, Soft Computing, 27 (2023), 3955-3964. https://doi.org/10.21203/
rs.3.rs-1416056/v1
//doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2
networks, Neural Networks, 14(2) (2001), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(00)00095-2
Mathematics and Computation, 247 (2014), 100-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.08.085
Neural Processing Letters, 45(3) (2017), 825-840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-016-9551-9
wavelet collocation method, Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 35 (2016), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.
1080/0954898X.2021.1884762
order integro-differential equation, Applied Numerical Mathematics, 171 (2022), 249-268. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.apnum
(1978), 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0067700
optimal control problems with Atangana–Baleanu derivative, Optimal Control Applications and Methods, 43(6)
(2022), 1753-1777. https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.2924
via fuzzy systems with application in delay optimal control problems, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 21(2)
(2024), 67-85. https://doi.org/10.22111/IJFS.2024.43498.7646
problems of the Laplace equation, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 141 (2023), 129-144. https:
//doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2023.04.026
(4637-4642), IEEE, (1999). https://doi.org/10.1002/3527607455.CH11
solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations, Journal of Computational
Physics, 378 (2019), 686-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045
nonlinear weakly singular Fredholm integro-differential equations, Applied Numerical Mathematics, 181 (2022),
135-150. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4186485/v1
(2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.2009
Letters, 76(11) (1996), 1804. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.1804
(1979), 376-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1979.tb29482.x
coupled chaotic systems, Physical Review E, 51(2) (1995), 980. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.
51.980
piecewise adomian decomposition method, Mathematical Modelling and Analysis, 18(4) (2013), 543-560. https:
//doi.org/10.3846/13926292.2013.841598
chaotic system using adaptive control technique in noisy environments, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 164 (2022),
112710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112710
delays and bounded perturbations, Nonlinear Dynamics, 83(1-2) (2016), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.
1007/s11071-015-2310-z
Neural Networks, 12(6) (2001), 1445-1454. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.963779
In Innovative Techniques and Applications of Modelling, Identification and Control, (321-330) (2018), Springer,
Singapore.
non-identical fractional-order chaotic systems using active control method, Nonlinear Dynamics, 76(2) (2014),
905-914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-013-1177-0
supervised fuzzy clustering, Neurocomputing, 69 (2006), 1570-1581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2005.
06.014
chaotic neural systems with external disturbances, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 157 (2022), 111917. https:
//doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111917
Journal of Computational Physics, 492 (2023), 112452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2023.112452
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 3(5) (1992), 807-814. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.159070
control based on DNA strand displacement, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience, 22 (2023), 836-844. https:
//doi.org/10.1109/TNB.2023.3241652
and stochastic perturbations, Nonlinear Dynamics, 84(1) (2016), 261-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/
S11071-015-2433-2
of chaotic systems with application in memristor oscillator, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 360 (2023), 12101-
12124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2023.09.019
distributed delays via quantized intermittent pinning control, Nonlinear Dynamics, 94(3) (2018), 2289-2303.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-018-4449-x
ISA Transactions, 94 (2019), 108-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2019.04.016