Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Department of Industrial Engineering, Ro.C., Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran
2 Department of Mathematics, Ro.C., Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran
Abstract
Multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) methods are essential tools for solving complex decision problems by offering systematic approaches for evaluating and ranking multiple criteria and alternatives. Despite considerable progress in MADM techniques, challenges persist in ensuring the reliability and consistency of outcomes, particularly under fuzzy environments. A recent advancement the hybrid best-worst method with fuzzy preference programming approach (the BWM-FPP model) has demonstrated promise, notably in hospital performance evaluations. However, the weight vector derived from the BWM-FPP model is a locally weakly efficient, and but not necessarily a locally efficient weight vector, which limits its robustness in practical applications. To address this shortcoming, we propose an enhanced two-phase model that guarantees the derivation of a locally efficient weight vector. In Phase 1, the model maximizes the minimum membership degree, ensuring a strong baseline of reliability, while Phase 2 improves overall robustness by maximizing the mean membership degree. The proposed model's effectiveness is demonstrated through theoretical validation, four numerical examples, and a real-world case study in the automotive after-sales service sector. Results show significant improvements in membership degrees and reliability, validating the model’s practical applicability. In the case study, key service quality criteria such as Reliability, Tangibles, and Assurance emerged as most influential, underscoring their critical role in after-sales service evaluation.
Keywords
- BWM-FPP model
- Two-phase model
- Locally efficient weight vector
- Membership degree
- After-sales service criteria
Main Subjects
ciene, A new fuzzy approach based on BWM and fuzzy preference programming for hospital performance evaluation:
A case study, Applied Soft Computing, 92 (2020), 106279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106279
ciene, A novel model for multi-criteria assessment based on BWM and possibilistic chance-constrained programming,
Computers and Industrial Engineering, 156 (2021), 107287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107287
quality on customer satisfaction in an automotive after-sales service, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology,
Market, and Complexity, 7(2) (2021), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020116
in automotive industry, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 14(3) (2023), 653-678. https://doi.org/10.
1108/IJLSS-03-2022-0055
hensive evaluation, in 2021 3rd International Conference on Applied Machine Learning (ICAML), IEEE (2021),
302-305. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAML54311.2021.00070
Change, 13(5) (2004), 727-756. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth029
to H2 refuelling site selection, Expert Systems with Applications, 216 (2023), 119470. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.eswa.2022.119470
sets, strategic fuzzy extensions and decision-making techniques, CRC Press, (2024), 107-134. https://doi.org/10.
1201/9781003497219
criteria of blockchain technology in the automotive industry supply chain, Expert Systems with Applications, 198
(2022), 116826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116826
making, Information Sciences, 547 (2021), 1080-1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.09.014
Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(7) (2023) 55-70. https://doi.org/10.22111/ijfs.2023.7630
based aggregation, Expert Systems with Applications, 196 (2022), 116667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.
2022.116667
lationship in the after-sales service network; case study in the automotive industry, International Journal of Manage
ment Science and Engineering Management, 18(3) (2023), 225-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2022.
2116733
framework, International Journal of Business Performance Management, 9(2) (2007), 145-171. https://doi.org/
10.1504/IJBPM.2007.011860
27 (2020), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1667
Systems, 121 (2017), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.01.010
automobile industry, Research in Transportation Business ans Management, 45 (2022), 100873. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100873
Production, 221 (2019), 768-784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.19355
and its applications: A perspective of incomplete reciprocal preference relation, Information Sciences, 634 (2023),
761-778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2023.03.125
The Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, (2001), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853134.
2001.10754261
triangular fuzzy number: A case study of maintenance assessment in the hospitals, Applied Soft Computing, 86
(2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105882
level or profit or both?, International Journal of Production Economics, 127(1) (2010), 136-146. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.05.005
service experience, in Managing Complexity, Proceedings of the 8th World Conference on Mass Customization,
Personalization, and Co-Creation (MCPC 2015), Montreal, Canada, October 20th-22th, 2015, Springer (2017),
405-420. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29058-432
after-sales service, European Journal of Operational Research, 239(2) (2014), 377-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.ejor.2014.05.035
Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157(10) (2006), 1328-1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2005.12.003
based on information axioms and BWM: Prototype design selection, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 127
(2019), 788-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.11.018
in the railway sector, Journal of Business Research, 89 (2018), 371-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.
2017.12.040
to the supply chain management problems, Applied Soft Computing, 151 (2024), 111182. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.asoc.2023.111182
using q-rung orthopair fuzzy Mahalanobis distance, Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(2) (2023), 2311-2348. https:
//doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10578-1
making, Information Sciences, 374 (2016), 224-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.08.074
in after sales services, Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 23(11-12) (2012), 1397-1411. https:
//doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2012.715797
profitability and customer satisfaction, Procedia Manufacturing, 55 (2021), 463-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.promfg.2021.10.06356
1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
fuzzy TOPSIS, Environment, Development and Sustainability, (2021), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10668-021-01662-z
tomer satisfaction, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 56 (2020), 102139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jretconser.2020.102139
and store loyalty, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 28(2) (2000), 73-82. https://doi.
org/10.1108/09590550010315223
worst method and fuzzy inference system, Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Support Systems, 5(4) (2018),
13-18. http://jscdss.com/index.php/files/article/view/174
Price and popularity moderation, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 28 (2018), 16-29. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.elerap.2018.01.002
Pythagorean fuzzy CRITIC-MARCOS method, Information Sciences, 664 (2024), 120326. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.elerap.2018.01.002
102974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2023.102974
fuzzy best-worst and extended VIKOR methods, Information Sciences, 502 (2019), 394-417. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.ins.2019.06.049