Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Faculty of Applied Science, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT)
2 College of Natural Science, Can Tho University, Vietnam
Abstract
This article develops a novel classification algorithm that integrates the improved Bayesian approach with Principal Component Analysis (PCA). First, PCA significantly reduces the dimensionality of the data while enhancing inter-class separability, thereby improving classification performance. Next, the prior probabilities are refined based on newly derived variables established for both the training and test sets using a fuzzy clustering analysis technique. Finally, the Bayesian classification rule is constructed based on the probability density functions of the classes, using the transformed variables obtained from PCA and the estimated prior probabilities. The algorithm is presented in detail, including procedural steps, illustrative example, and implementation on both numerical and image data through a the establised RStudio procedure. A key contribution of this study lies in the theoretical enhancement of Bayes error analysis and the proof of convergence of the proposed algorithm. Empirical applications demonstrate that the proposed algorithm yields stable results and outperforms several existing approaches when applied to certain numerical and image datasets using statistical parameters.
Keywords
- Bayesian classifier
- fuzzy relationship
- image analysis
- posterior probability
- principal component analysis
Main Subjects
Distance and similarity measures effect on the performance of k-nearest neighbor classifier: A review, Big Data,
7(2) (2019), 123-144. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2018.0175
and Applications for Engineers and System Designers (Springer, 2015), 39-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/
978-1-4302-5990-9_3
classification model with multiple graph features, Wireless Personal Communications, 127 (2022), 695-714. https:
//doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08399-y
Electrical and Computer Engineering, 17 (2017), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.4316/AECE.2017.04001
//doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
on naive Bayes classifier using FPGA, 2016 International Automatic Control Conference (CACS), IEEE, (2016),
7-12. https://doi.org/10.1109/CACS.2016.7973875
(2014), 1739-1746. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu101
29(2) (1997), 103-130. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007413511361
of Cybernetics, 3 (1973), 32-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01969727308546046
learning machine framework, Remote Sensing, 12(22) (2020), 3708. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12223708
//doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1938.tb02189.x
2nd ed., Springer, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7
//doi.org/10.1002/9781118548387
learning in cancer genomics, Cancer Genomics and Proteomics, 15 (2018), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.21873/
cgp.20063
infected with COVID-19 based on the extracted feature interval, Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical
Engineering: Imaging and Visualization, 11 (2023), 856-865. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681163.2022.2117645
and the quasi Bayesian method, Computational Statistics, 39 (2024), 2677-2701. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00180-023-01400-1
20 (1960), 141-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
on the performance of credit scoring models in the agribusiness sector, The Journal of Credit Risk, 16(4) (2021),
119-156. https://doi.org/10.21314/JCR.2020.272
overall comparison, Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science, 21 (2016), 117-134. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.sorms.2016.10.001
systems, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 4(1) (2007), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.22111/ijfs.2007.355
classification on the current state of research guiding future direction, Health and Technology, 11 (2021), 1-23.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-021-00555-5
from food, fruits and vegetables wastes using artificial neural network (ANN), Fuel, 285 (2021), 119081. https:
//doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119081
by Bayesian method, Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 11 (2017), 629-643. https://doi.org/10.
1007/s11634-016-0253-y
of support vector machine, bayesian logistic regression, and alternating decision tree algorithms for shallow landslide
susceptibility mapping along a mountainous road in the west of Iran, Applied Sciences, 10(15) (2020), 5047. https:
//doi.org/10.3390/app10155047
discriminant analysis, Statistical Methods and Applications, 16 (2007), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10260-006-0012-x
in Statistics–Simulation and Computation, 37(2) (2008), 320-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/
03610910701790475
applications, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(5) (2023), 171-187. https://doi.org/10.22111/ijfs.2023.
7834
//www.jstor.org/stable/2242011
385-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2016.1174194
Theory and Related Fields, 2(2) (2018), 150-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/24754269.2018.1528420
Decision Making, 18 (2019), 151-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-018-9290-7
using Bayesian approach, Computational Economics, 59(2) (2022), 887-911. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10614-021-10115-8
2017 13th International Conference on Natural Computation, Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (ICNCFSKD),
(2017), 733-139. https://doi.org/10.1109/FSKD.2017.8393365
1910. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760903186049
Precision Agriculture, 19(4) (2018), 200-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-017-9524-9
without sharing data, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 19(5) (2012), 758-764. https:
//doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000862
classifiers, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 18(48) (2017), 1-33. http://jmlr.org/papers/v18/15-240.
html