Document Type : Research Paper
Author
PNU University
Abstract
Quality control charts with fuzzy data have been successfully used in many real-world applications in recent years. These methods have been extended to estimate the fuzzy population mean based on simple random sampling techniques. In this study, a different strategy is used to develop Shewhart control charts with fuzzy means based on fuzzy data. For this purpose, the conventional rank set sampling is first extended to a well-established fuzzy random variable. Then, based on the concept of fuzzy mean and exact variance, the lower, mean, and upper fuzzy control charts are introduced.
Additionally, an estimation procedure is presented that can be used to evaluate the proposed fuzzy control limits in cases where the fuzzy mean and exact variance of the population are unknown. An inclusion degree for monitoring process variability is also introduced and discussed. A real case study from photolithography is presented to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed method for monitoring control charts with fuzzy data based on fuzzy rank set sampling.
Keywords
- Fuzzy random variable
- fuzzy control chart
- fuzzy ranked set sampling
- degree of inclusion
- fuzzy control region
- fuzzy mean
- exact variance
Main Subjects
Statistics, 31(10) (2004), 1185-1201. https://doi.org/10.1080/0266476042000285549
triangular fuzzy number, Mathematics, 10(19) (2022), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10193572
number with unbalanced data, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 93(5) (2022), 634-645. https:
//doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2022.2116437
set sampling methods, Journal of Applied Statistics, 39(4) (2012), 745-763. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.
2011.611488
ranked set sampling, Economic Quality Control, 26 (2011), 73-89. https://doi.org/10.1515/eqc.2011.007
35(3) (2014), 215-235. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2021.015047
1936-1941. https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2007.1936.1941
International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety Engineering, 28(12) (2020), 2150012. https:
//doi.org/23-34.10.1142/S0218539321500121
comparable alternative to simple random sampling, Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 25 (2018), 237-256.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-018-0402-x
analyze variability in health monitoring processes, Applied Soft Computing, 164 (2024), 31-40. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111961
process capability, International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(4) (2019), 5390-5396. https:
//doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.D7615.118419
161(20) (2010), 2684-2694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2010.05.004
chart with an α-cut for monitoring a production process, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 46 (2021),
1911-1924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-05176-0
YorK, 2021.
//doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/12.1.22
1007/b138914
average control charts under ranked set sampling schemes, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 85
(2015), 1224-1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2013.873040
fish from length-frequency data, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 42(3) (2015), 848-871. https://doi.org/10.
1111/sjos.12140
2022. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003248644
fuzzy random variables, International Journal of Systems Science, 21 (2019), 1187-1195. https://doi.org/10.
1007/s40815-019-00610-4
adopted with α-values of fuzzy numbers, Soft Computing, 24 (2020), 3797-3807. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00500-019-04149-2
Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 27 (2010), 32-40. https://doi.org/671-685.10.1109/tfuzz.2018.2866811
Systems Science, 51 (2021), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2019.1701131
variables, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 518 (2025), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2025.109500
//doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-05176-0
Biological and Environmental Statistics, 8 (2003), 271-279. https://doi.org/10.1198/1085711032156
1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(78)90019-1
1007/3-540-32366-x
Inc., New York, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471790281
Resource Economics, 3(8) (1952), 385390. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9520385
//doi.org/10.1002/9781118491645
control charts, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 39(4) (2023), 1465-1493. https://doi.org/10.
1002/qre.3282
Journal of Statistics and Operation Research, 19(1) (2003), 107-128.
using paired double ranked set sampling, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 90(6) (2020), 1-13.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2020.1716756
4015-4025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05430-5
(1985), 1373-1379. https://doi.org/10.1214/aop/1176992822
findings, In: Awang, M., Emamian, S., Yusof, F. (eds), Advances in Material Sciences and Engineering. Lecture
Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8297-0_50
09.
set sampling, Biosciences Journal, 43 (2001), 357-373. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4036(200106)43:3
Bell System Technical Journal, 3(1) (1924). https://doi.org/43-87.10.1002/j.1538-7305.1924.tb01347.x
2013.
10.1198/tech.2007.s465
means of ordering, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 20 (1968), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.
1007/BF02911622
in Intelligent Systems and Information Processing, IEEE, New York, (1996), 496-501. https://doi.org/10.1109/
AFSS.1996.583677