Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
Université Norbert ZONGO
Abstract
In this work, we present a novel approach for resolving a fuzzy single-objective function with fuzzy constraints. The algorithm of the method is based on the null set concept and is focused on minimizing cases. With the null set concept, two partial subtraction orders for fuzzy numbers have been defined, namely simple subtraction and the Hukuhara difference. That allows us to define, respectively, optimal solutions and H-optimal solutions. First, the initial optimization problem is transformed into a deterministic, nonlinear, bi-objective optimization problem. Then, Karush Kuhn Tucker's (KKT) optimality conditions are applied to find deterministic optimal solutions. Finally, a few fuzzy algebraic operations are employed to transform deterministic optimal solutions into fuzzy optimal solutions for the initial solutions. In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach, we have dealt with eleven test problems from the literature. Our method has been compared to those of other methods, and our method is at least the best in each instance.
Keywords
Main Subjects
problems, Journal of Mathematical Extension, 10(2) (2016), 101-116.
duffing oscillator equations, Symmetry, 12(4) (2020), 572. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12040572
Neural Computing and Applications, 28 (2017), 1591-1610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-2110-x
distributed order derivative for solutions of fuzzy fractional Volterra and Fredholm integrodifferential equations, Mathematical
Methods in the Applied Sciences, (2021), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.160373702.28850586/v1
fractional initial value problems under the Mittag-Leffler kernel differential operator, Mathematical Methods in the
Applied Sciences, (2021) 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.7305
2013.
International Journal of Advances in Science and Technology, 4(2) (2012), 43-92.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141
with fuzzy coefficients, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19(1) (2022), 153-169. https://doi.org/10.22111/IJFS.
2022.6558
for fuzzy optimization problems, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 15(1) (2016), 57-73. https:
//doi.org/10.1007/s10700-015-9213-9
method, International Journal of Applied Mathematical Research, 6(4) (2017), 115-120. https://doi.org/10.
14419/ijamr.v6i4.8069
Computer Science and Network, 3(6) (2014), 568-572.
programming problems, Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, 10(4) (2023), 1481-1486. https://doi.
org/10.18280/mmep.100445
Boston, 2000.
Contemporary Mathematical Sciences, 7(4) (2012), 159-170.
International Journal of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, 6(1) (2010), 37-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/
978-3-319-31274-3_3
https://doi.org/10.22436/jnsa.001.04.05
problem, International Journal of Mathematical Science Education Techno-mathematics Research Foundation, 4(1)
(2011), 1-16.
(1986), 409-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(86)90093-4
hesitant cost coefficient, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(1) (2023), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.22111/
IJFS.2023.7351
of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics, 25(2) (2023), 111-123. https://doi.org/10.30948/afmi.2023.25.2.111
genetic algorithm, International Journal of Contemporary Mathematical Sciences, 5(16) (2010), 791-803.
systems, Proceedings of the 35th Conference on Decision and Control, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.1996.
577485
fluctuation smoothing rule in a wafer fabrication factory, Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2013 (2013), 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/720607
of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 113(13) (2017), 291-300.
Making, 2 (2003), 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025098722162
Optimization Theory and Applications, 121 (2004), 397-417. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTA.0000037411.
25509.6a
338 (2008), 299-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.05.023
Optimization Theory and Applications, 139 (2008), 361-378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-008-9419-x
and Decision Making, 8 (2009), 295-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/02331930601120037
fuzzy-valued objective, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 8 (2009), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10700-009-9049-2
Decision Making, 18 (2019), 279-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-018-9299-y
8 (1975), 199-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5
8 (1975), 301-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90046-8
Sciences, 9 (1975), 43-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2106-4_1