Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
- LeSheng Jin 1
- Ronald R. Yager 2
- Chao Ma 3
- Reza Langari 4
- Chiranjibe Jana 5
- Radko Mesiar 6
- Humberto Bustince 7
1 Business School, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China
2 Iona Cillege
3 No.296, Longzhong Road, Xiangcheng District
4 Department of Mechanical Engineering Texas A&M University College Station, TX 77843-3123 USA
5 vidyasagar university
6 Faculty of Civil Engineering, Department of Mathematics, Slovak University of Technology (STU), Bratislava, Slovakia
7 Department of Statistics, Computer Science and Mathematics, Public University of Navarre
Abstract
The concepts of cognitive interval information and cognitive uncertain information, which are two recently proposed types of uncertain information, have been extended in this work to the typical hesitant fuzzy environment. We introduce the notions of typical hesitant monopolar cognitive interval information and typical hesitant cognitive uncertain information. To facilitate their analysis, we define uncertainty degree functions and score functions for these concepts using extended aggregation operators. Furthermore, we reanalyze some decision models discussed in earlier literature using these newly proposed concepts to demonstrate their advantages and potential applications.
Keywords
- Cognitive interval information
- cognitive uncertain information
- decision making
- group decision making
- information fusion
- uncertain information
Main Subjects
978-3-7908-1870-3_1
elements and the action of automorphisms, Information Sciences, 255 (2014), 82-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.ins.2013.08.024
Journal of Intelligent Systems, 29 (2014), 525-543. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21655
Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 396 (2020), 51-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2020.01.005
problem, European Journal of Operational Research, 290(1) (2021), 346-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.
2020.07.057
Media, 2002.
between integrated urban rail transit system and urban form: A BULI-based MCLSGA model with the wisdom of
crowds, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 31(2) (2023), 434-448. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2022.
3185680
uncertainty: A two-stage LSP-ELECTRE III-based approach, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 94
(2020), 103835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103835
Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 30(12) (2022), 5496-5510. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2022.3179594
maturity assessment, Automation in Construction, 149 (2023), 104808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.
2023.104808
610-614. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.229476
Quarterly, 22 (1976), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1002/malq.19760220120
Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 44(6) (2023), 9411-9418. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-223119
fusion and decision making, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 16 (2023), 60. https:
//doi.org/10.1007/s44196-023-00227-4
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2021.01.004
Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33 (2018), 759-770. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.21961
Systems, 27(3) (2019), 612-617. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2893371
Journal of General Systems, 49(8) (2020), 843-855. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081079.2020.1786822
uncertain involved information fusion, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 15 (2022), 12.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-022-00066-9
multi-sources evaluation and rules based decision making, International Journal of General Systems, 52(4) (2023),
443-454. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081079.2022.2142217
weights allocation in group decision-making with BUI, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems,
15 (2022), 54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-022-00116-2
26(4) (2018), 2475-2478. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2017.2756828
Sets and Systems, 448 (2022), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2022.01.002
values and rules for heterogeneous linguistic input information, International Journal of Computational Intelligence
Systems, 14 (2021), 153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-021-00003-2
org/10.1002/int.20418
on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18(1) (1988), 183-190. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.87068
(1996), 49-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-111X(199601)11:1<49::AID-INT3>3.0.CO;2-Z
1016/S0165-0114(02)00432-3
j.ins.2011.02.022